There is no
consensus on how to report total joint replacement (TJR) trials. To our
knowledge, core outcome domains for TJR clinical trials have not been defined.
Our objective was to develop data-driven, consensus-based, preliminary
recommendations for core outcome domains for TJR clinical trials.
We surveyed two
groups of experts/stakeholders, who rated
potential core outcome domains (mapped to Outcome Measures in Rheumatology
Trials (OMERACT) filter 2.0 framework) for their relevance to TJR clinical
trials during the 2014 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons [AAOS].
Outcome Research
Interest Group of the Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS) annual meeting and the
2014 OMERACT meeting. Ratings were on a 1-9 scale, 1-3 indicating domain of
limited importance, 4-6 being important domain, and 7-9 being critically
important domain.
No comments:
Post a Comment